Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Anapol, Malthon M. |
|---|---|
| Titel | A Critical Evaluation of Legally Oriented Communication Research. |
| Quelle | (1973), (15 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
| Schlagwörter | Communication (Thought Transfer); Court Litigation; Debate; Information Theory; Lawyers; Legal Education; Legal Problems; Legal Responsibility; Persuasive Discourse; Research Opportunities; Rhetoric; Rhetorical Criticism |
| Abstract | Rhetorical critics generally base their comments on the assumption that a communicator has all the reasons, persuasive devices, and approaches available in the rhetorical situation, and that he can make choices of what should be utilized. The lawyer-persuader, however, does not have unlimited choice since he is bound by legal rules and constraints. Therefore, the rhetorical critic must at least be aware of the legal constraints before he can criticize lawyers' choices and persuasive methods. Courtroom atmospheres, settings, and traditions, as well as laws and set procedures, impose rhetorical restrictions. Some recently published articles on the communication process and on forensics indicated an awareness among scholars of the possibilities that unique courtroom situations offer for further communication research. (RN) |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
