Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Krinzinger, Helga; Koten, Jan Willem; Hennemann, Julia; Schueppen, André; Sahr, Katleen; Arndt, Dominique; Konrad, Kerstin; Willmes, Klaus |
---|---|
Titel | Sensitivity, reproducibility, and reliability of self-paced versus fixed stimulus presentation in an fMRI study on exact, non-symbolic arithmetic in typically developing children aged between 6 and 12 years. |
Quelle | In: Developmental neuropsychology, 36 (2011) 6, S. 721-740
PDF als Volltext |
Beigaben | Literaturangaben |
Zusatzinformation | Forschungsdaten, Studiendetails und Erhebungsinstrumente |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | online; gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1532-6942; 8756-5641 |
DOI | 10.1080/87565641.2010.549882 |
Schlagwörter | Zuverlässigkeit; Reliabilität; Vergleich; Sensibilität; Stimulation (Psy); Stimulus-Response-Theorie; Stimulusparameter; Grundschule; Modell; Neurologie; Schüler; Sensibilität; Studium; Zuverlässigkeit; Hirnforschung; Hirnfunktion; Sensitivität; Vergleich; Reliabilität; Vergleichbarkeit; Grundschule; Schüler; Hirnforschung; Hirnfunktion; Vergleichende Analyse; Magnetresonanzverfahren; Studium; Neurologie; Grundschulalter; Modell; Sensitivität; Vergleichbarkeit |
Abstract | Fixed stimulus presentation times pose several methodological problems for developmental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies that can be avoided by self-paced study designs. Yet, methodological issues of self-paced stimulus presentation for fMRI studies are largely understudied. Therefore, we compared sensitivity, reproducibility, and reliability of neural activation of a fixed and a self-paced design for an exact, non-symbolic addition paradigm in a sample of children aged 6-12 years. Both design types were comparable in sensitivity, and the self-paced design was superior in reproducibility and reliability. Therefore, self-paced study designs seem to be a valid option for developmental fMRI studies on higher cognition. (Orig.). |
Erfasst von | DIPF | Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, Frankfurt am Main |
Update | 2022/2 |