Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Cushing Weigle, Sara |
|---|---|
| Titel | Validation of automated scores of TOEFL iBT tasks against non-test indicators of writing ability. |
| Quelle | In: Language testing, 27 (2010) 3, S. 335-353Infoseite zur Zeitschrift |
| Beigaben | Anhang; Anmerkungen 2 |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0265-5322 |
| Schlagwörter | Empirische Forschung; Validität; Schreibtest; Test; Methodik; Computer; Schriftlicher Ausdruck; Vergleichende Analyse; Fremdsprachenunterricht; Englischunterricht; TOEFL; Schreiben |
| Abstract | Automated scoring has the potential to dramatically reduce the time and costs associated with the assessment of complex skills such as writing, but its use must be validated against a variety of criteria for it to be accepted by test users and stakeholders. The reported study approaches validity by comparing human and automated scores on responses to TOEFL® iBT Independent writing tasks with several non-test indicators of writing ability: student self-assessment, instructor assessment, and independent ratings of non-test writing samples. Automated scores were produced using e-rater®, developed by Educational Testing Service (ETS). Correlations between both human and e-rater scores and non-test indicators were moderate but consistent, providing criterion-related validity evidence for the use of e-rater along with human scores. The implications of the findings for the validity of automated scores are discussed. (Verlag, adapt.). |
| Erfasst von | Informationszentrum für Fremdsprachenforschung, Marburg |
| Update | 2022/3 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
