Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Onea, Edgar; Volodina, Anna |
|---|---|
| Titel | Der Schein trügt nämlich. |
| Quelle | In: Linguistische Berichte, (2009) 219, S. 291-321 |
| Beigaben | Anmerkungen |
| Sprache | deutsch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0024-3930 |
| Schlagwörter | Empirische Forschung; Diskurs; Partikel; Semantik; Syntax; Deutsch; Ambiguität; Empirische Forschung; Topikalisierung; Deutsch; Partikel; Pragmatik (Ling); Semantik; Syntax; Topikalisierung; Ambiguität; Diskurs |
| Abstract | The German particle nämlich is puzzling because it seems to have two independent semantic functions which strictly correlate with specific syntactic environments: if nämlich precedes an "orphan constituent" (Haegeman 1991) it specifies a vague discourse referent in the previous clause, and if nämlich appears in a whole clause its function is marking that the host-clause delivers an explanation to the previous clause. A polysemy- or even homonymy-analysis seems problematic precisely because of this strict correlation between syntactic environment and semantic function. In the paper the authors propose a unified analysis of nämlich. They argue that nämlich marks the property of the context that there is an implicit question to which the host of nämlich delivers a direct (short) answer (Jacobson 2008). Crucially, constituents are good short answers to constituent-questions (Who?), while whole clauses are only good short answers to "sentence"-questions like Why p? Building on these intuitions the authors show how both readings of nämlich can systematically be derived and implement their analysis formally. (Verlag, adapt.). |
| Erfasst von | Informationszentrum für Fremdsprachenforschung, Marburg |
| Update | 2022/3 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
