Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Gillborn, David |
|---|---|
| Titel | Education policy as an act of white supremacy: whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. |
| Quelle | In: Journal of education policy, 20 (2005) 4, S. 485-506Infoseite zur Zeitschrift |
| Beigaben | Literaturangaben |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0268-0939 |
| Schlagwörter | Empirische Untersuchung; Bildungspolitik; Diskriminierung; England; Kritische Theorie; Rassismus; Bildungspolitik; Ungleichheit; Rassenintegration; Kritische Theorie; Ungleichheit; Diskriminierung; Rassenintegration; Rassismus; England |
| Abstract | The paper presents an empirical analysis of education policy in England that is informed by recent developments in US critical theory. In particular, [the author draws] on 'whiteness studies' and the application of critical race theory (CRT). These perspectives offer a new and radical way of conceptualizing the role of racism in education. Although the US literature has paid little or no regard to issues outside North America, [the author argues] that a similar understanding of racism (as a multifaceted, deeply embedded, often taken-for-granted aspect of power relations) lies at the heart of recent attempts to understand institutional racism in the UK. Having set out the conceptual terrain in the first half of the paper, [the author then applies] this approach to recent changes in the English education system to reveal the central role accorded the defence (and extension) of race inequity. Finally, the paper touches on the question of racism and intentionality: although race inequity may not be a planned and deliberate goal of education policy neither is it accidental. The patterning of racial advantage and inequity is structured in domination and its continuation represents a form of tacit intentionality on the part of white power holders and policy-makers. It is in this sense that education policy is an act of white supremacy. Following others in the CRT tradition, therefore, the paper's analysis concludes that the most dangerous form of 'white supremacy' is not the obvious and extreme fascistic posturing of small neo-nazi groups, but rather the taken-for-granted routine privileging of white interests that goes unremarked in the political mainstream. (DIPF/Orig.). |
| Erfasst von | DIPF | Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, Frankfurt am Main |
| Update | 2006/1 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
