The accuracy of the 24-h activity recall method for assessing sedentary behaviour. The physical activity measurement survey (PAMS) project.

Autor/inn/en	Kim, Youngwon; Welk, Gregory J.
Titel	The accuracy of the 24-h activity recall method for assessing sedentary behaviour. The physical activity measurement survey (PAMS) project. Gefälligkeitsübersetzung: Die Genauigkeit der 24-h Recall Methode zur Messung der im Sitzen verbrachten Zeit. Das "Physical activity measurement survey (PAMS)" Projekt.
Quelle	In: Journal of sports sciences, 35 (2017) 3, S. 255-261 PDF als Volltext Link als defekt meldenVerfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	online; gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0264-0414; 1466-447X
DOI	10.1080/02640414.2016.1161218
Schlagwörter	Forschung; Validität; Vergleichsuntersuchung; Akzeleration; Erwachsener; Forschung; Gesundheit; Gesundheitserziehung; Lebensführung; Sportgerät; Sportwissenschaft; Validität; Analyse; Sitzen; Aktivität; Akzeleration; Bewegungsmangel; Aktivität; Bewegungsmangel; Gesundheit; Gesundheitserziehung; Sitzen; Sportgerät; Sportwissenschaft; Analyse; Lebensführung; Erwachsener
Abstract	Sedentary behaviour (SB) has emerged as a modifiable risk factor, but little is known about measurement errors of SB. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of 24-h Physical Activity Recall (24PAR) relative to SenseWear Armband (SWA) for assessing SB. Each participant (n = 1485) undertook a series of data collection procedures on two randomly selected days: wearing a SWA for full 24-h, and then completing the telephone-administered 24PAR the following day to recall the past 24-h activities. Estimates of total sedentary time (TST) were computed without the inclusion of reported or recorded sleep time. Equivalence testing was used to compare estimates of TST. Analyses from equivalence testing showed no significant equivalence of 24PAR for TST (90% CI: 443.0 and 457.6 min · day-1) relative to SWA (equivalence zone: 580.7 and 709.8 min · day-1). Bland-Altman plots indicated individuals that were extremely or minimally sedentary provided relatively comparable sedentary time between 24PAR and SWA. Overweight/obese and/or older individuals were more likely to under-estimate sedentary time than normal weight and/or younger individuals. Measurement errors of 24PAR varied by the level of sedentary time and demographic indicators. This evidence informs future work to develop measurement error models to correct for errors of self-reports. (Autor).
Erfasst von	Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft, Bonn
Update	2017/2