When gender fits self-regulatory preferences. The impact of regulatory fit on gender-based ingroup favoritism.

Autor/inn/en	Sassenberg, Kai; Brazy, Paige C.; Jonas, Kai J.; Shah, James Y.
Titel	When gender fits self-regulatory preferences. The impact of regulatory fit on gender-based ingroup favoritism.
Quelle	In: Social psychology, 44 (2013) 1, S. 4-15Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Link als defekt meldenVerfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	online; gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1864-9335; 2151-2590
DOI	10.1027/1864-9335/a000095
Schlagwörter	Gruppenzugehörigkeit; Leistungsfähigkeit; Frau; Geschlechtsspezifischer Unterschied; Frau; Leistungsfähigkeit; Mann; Präferenz; Anspruch; Anspruch; Präferenz; Mann
Abstract	Females are perceived to have less power than males. These differences in perceived power might render different self-regulatory strategies appropriate: Women should (as members of other low-power groups) care about security, whereas men should (as members of other high-power groups) strive for accomplishment. These regulatory implications of gender provide the basis for regulatory fit between individuals' gender and their regulatory focus. Higher fit should lead to stronger gender-based ingroup favoritism: Prevention-focused females and promotion-focused males were expected to show more ingroup favoritism than both sexes in the respective other regulatory focus. According to the regulatory fit hypothesis, this effect should occur for evaluative- but not for stereotype-based ingroup favoritism. Three studies supported these hypotheses. (ZPID).
Erfasst von	Leibniz-Institut für Psychologie, Trier
Update	2013/3