Stopping while Going! Response Inhibition Does Not Suffer Dual-Task Interference

Autor/inn/en	Yamaguchi, Motonori; Logan, Gordon D.; Bissett, Patrick G.
Titel	Stopping while Going! Response Inhibition Does Not Suffer Dual-Task Interference
Quelle	In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38 (2012) 1, S.123-134 (12 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0096-1523
DOI	10.1037/a0023918
Schlagwörter	Evidence; Reaction Time; Inhibition; Program Effectiveness; Task Analysis; Experiments; Executive Function; Models; Feedback (Response); Experimental Psychology; Foreign Countries; Universities; Computer Uses in Education; Canada + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Evidenz; Reaktionsvermögen; Hemmung; Aufgabenanalyse; Erprobung; Analogiemodell; Experimentelle Psychologie; Ausland; University; Universität; Computernutzung; Kanada
Abstract	Although dual-task interference is ubiquitous in a variety of task domains, stop-signal studies suggest that response inhibition is not subject to such interference. Nevertheless, no study has directly examined stop-signal performance in a dual-task setting. In two experiments, stop-signal performance was examined in a psychological refractory period task, in which subjects inhibited one response while still executing the other. The results showed little evidence for the refractory effect in stop-signal reaction time, and stop-signal reaction time was similar in dual-task and single-task conditions, despite the fact that overt reaction times were significantly affected by dual-task interference. Therefore, the present study supports the claim that response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference. (Contains 9 tables, 6 figures and 2 footnotes.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10