Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Knollman-Porter, Kelly; Bevelhimer, Andrew; Hux, Karen; Wallace, Sarah E.; Hughes, Michael R.; Brown, Jessica A. |
|---|---|
| Titel | Eye Fixation Behaviors and Processing Time of People with Aphasia and Neurotypical Adults When Reading Narratives with and without Text-to-Speech Support |
| Quelle | In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 66 (2023) 1, S.276-295 (20 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
| Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Knollman-Porter, Kelly) ORCID (Hux, Karen) ORCID (Wallace, Sarah E.) |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 1092-4388 |
| Schlagwörter | Eye Movements; Aphasia; Reading Processes; Assistive Technology; Reading Comprehension; Decoding (Reading); Reading Strategies; Measures (Individuals); Reading Fluency; Reading Rate |
| Abstract | Background: Researchers have used eye-tracking technology to investigate eye movements in neurotypical adults (NAs) when reading. The technology can provide comparable information about people with aphasia (PWA). Eye fixations occurring when PWA do and do not have access to text-to-speech (TTS) technology are of interest because the support improves reading comprehension and decreases processing time for at least some PWA. Aims: This study's purpose was to examine forward, regressive, and off-track eye fixations when PWA and NAs read narratives in read-only (RO) and TTS conditions. A secondary aim was to examine the influence of eye fixations on processing time. Method and Procedure: A Tobii Dynavox Pro Spectrum eye tracker recorded eye movements of nine PWA and nine NAs while reading narratives in two conditions. Movements of interest were forward fixations; within-word, within-sentence, and previous-sentence regressive fixations; and off-track fixations. Outcomes and Results: PWA exhibited significantly more forward and regressive fixations in the RO than TTS condition, whereas NAs showed opposite behaviors. NAs had significantly more off-track fixations in the TTS than RO condition, whereas PWA exhibited no difference across conditions. PWA took significantly longer to process content in the RO condition, whereas NAs took longer in the TTS condition. Conclusions: PWA and NAs differ in important ways when processing texts with and without TTS support. Examining eye-tracking data provides a means of gaining insight into the decoding and reading comprehension challenges of PWA and helps elucidate how assistive technology can mediate these challenges. (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2200 Research Blvd #250, Rockville, MD 20850. Tel: 301-296-5700; Fax: 301-296-8580; e-mail: slhr@asha.org; Web site: http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2024/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
