Do Schools with Adequate Tier I SWPBIS Implementation Have Stronger Implementation at Tiers II and III?

Autor/inn/en	Kim, Jerin; McIntosh, Kent; Hoselton, Rob
Institution	Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) (ED/OSEP)
Titel	Do Schools with Adequate Tier I SWPBIS Implementation Have Stronger Implementation at Tiers II and III?
Quelle	(2014), (7 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Positive Behavior Supports; Program Implementation; Student Behavior; Behavior Problems; Fidelity; Correlation; Statistical Analysis; Program Effectiveness; Elementary Schools; Middle Schools; High Schools; Evidence Based Practice + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Student behaviour; Schülerverhalten; Korrelation; Statistische Analyse; Elementary school; Grundschule; Volksschule; Middle school; Mittelschule; Mittelstufenschule; High school; Oberschule
Abstract	To illustrate the three-tiered model, Tier I (universal) supports are delivered similarly to all students in all settings, and at least 80% of students are expected to respond to these supports. Beyond universal supports, Tier II (targeted) supports serve 10-15% of students whose behavior does not respond to Tier I supports. A small group of students with chronic and severe problem behaviors may require Tier III (intensive individual) supports, interventions that are tailored to students' specific needs. The purpose of this evaluation brief is to answer the following questions: (1) To what extent do schools with adequate Tier I SWPBIS implementation have stronger implementation at Tiers II and III?; and (2) Which components of Tier I systems are most strongly related to implementation of Tier II and III systems? (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. e-mail: support@pbis.org; Web site: http://www.pbis.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01