Early Careers of Recent U.S. Social Science PhDs

Autor/inn/en	Morrison, Emory; Rudd, Elizabeth; Nerad, Maresi
Titel	Early Careers of Recent U.S. Social Science PhDs
Quelle	In: Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences, 4 (2011) 2, S.6-29 (24 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1755-2273
DOI	10.3167/latiss.2011.040202
Schlagwörter	Careers; Tenure; Females; Social Sciences; Labor Market; Graduates; Education Work Relationship; Foreign Countries; Doctoral Degrees; Employment Level; Career Development; Surveys; Occupational Aspiration; College Faculty; Job Skills; Program Effectiveness; Gender Differences; United States + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Career; Karriere; Amtszeit; Beschäftigungsdauer; Weibliches Geschlecht; Social science; Sozialwissenschaften; Gesellschaftswissenschaften; Labour market; Arbeitsmarkt; Graduate; Absolvent; Absolventin; Hochschulabsolvent; Hochschulabsolventin; Ausland; Doctoral degree; Doktorgrad; Beschäftigungsgrad; Berufsentwicklung; Survey; Umfrage; Befragung; Berufsneigung; Berufsziel; Fakultät; Produktive Fertigkeit; Geschlechterkonflikt; USA
Abstract	In this article, we analyse findings of the largest, most comprehensive survey of the career paths of social science PhD graduates to date, "Social Science PhDs--Five+Years Out (SS5)". "SS5" surveyed more than 3,000 graduates of U.S. PhD programmes in six social science fields six to ten years after earning their PhD. The survey collected data on family, career and graduate school experiences. Like previous studies in Australia, the U.K., the U.S.A. and Germany, SS5 found that graduates several years after completing their education had mostly positive labour market experiences, but only after undergoing a transitional period of insecurity and uncertainty. Most SS5 doctoral students wanted to become professors, despite the difficult academic job market and the existence of a non-academic market for PhD labour. Many respondents' career pathways included a delayed move into a faculty tenure-track position, but exceptionally few moved from a faculty tenure-track position into another labour market sector. Respondents reported that their PhD programmes had not trained them well in several skills important for academic and non-academic jobs. Men's and women's career paths were remarkably similar, but, we argue, women "subsidised" gender equality in careers by paying higher personal costs than men. We conclude with recommendations. (Contains 9 notes, 4 tables, and 1 figure.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Berghahn Journals. 150 Broadway Suite 812, New York, NY 10038. Tel: 212-233-6004; Fax: 212-233-6007; e-mail: journals@berghahnbooks.com; Web site: http://www.journals.berghahnbooks.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10