Interactive Metadiscourse Markers in the Turkish Articles on Science and Social Sciences

Autor/in	Kan, Mustafa Onur
Titel	Interactive Metadiscourse Markers in the Turkish Articles on Science and Social Sciences
Quelle	In: Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16 (2021) 3, S.56-66 (11 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Kan, Mustafa Onur)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1949-4289
Schlagwörter	Discourse Analysis; Text Structure; Research Reports; Sciences; Social Sciences; Periodicals; Journal Articles; Guidelines; Turkish; Scientific Research; Academic Language; Language Usage; Foreign Countries; Authors; Audience Awareness; Native Language; Turkey + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Diskursanalyse; Textstruktur; Research report; Forschungsbericht; Science; Wissenschaft; Social science; Sozialwissenschaften; Gesellschaftswissenschaften; Periodical; Journal; Zeitschrift; Fachzeitschrift; Periodikum; Journal article; Zeitschriftenaufsatz; Richtlinien; Türkisch; Academic; Language; Languages; Akademiker; Sprache; Wissenschaftssprache; Sprachgebrauch; Ausland; Author; Autor; Autorin; Türkei
Abstract	This study aims to identify the interactive metadiscourse markers in the main sections of the articles (introduction, method, findings, results, discussion and conclusion) in the fields of science and social sciences. Designed as a descriptive research, this study employs the survey model. The articles analyzed in this study are a total of 16 articles, 8 science and 8 social sciences articles selected from the science and social sciences journals at DergiPark. The study group of this paper includes 54,253 words, 16,301 of which are in the articles on science and 37,952 are in the articles on social sciences. To achieve, this study draws on Hyland and Tse's framework of metadiscourse model. The data are analyzed through descriptive analysis method. A Mann-Whitney U test is performed to find out whether there is a significant difference in the use of metadiscourse markers identified in the descriptive analysis of the articles on science and social sciences. The analysis indicate that more interactive metadiscourse markers are used in the articles on social sciences compared to the articles on science; yet, this difference is not significant. Furthermore, the use of code glosses is significant for social sciences; nonetheless, there is no significant difference in the use of other interactive metadiscourse markers. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	International Association of Educators. Egitim Fakultesi Dekanligi, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale 17100, Turkey. e-mail: secretary@inased.org; Web site: https://inased.org/epasrpi/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01