Jim Greer's and Mary Mark's Reviews of Evaluation Methods for Adaptive Systems: A Brief Comment about New Goals

Autor/in	du Boulay, Benedict
Titel	Jim Greer's and Mary Mark's Reviews of Evaluation Methods for Adaptive Systems: A Brief Comment about New Goals
Quelle	In: International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31 (2021) 3, S.622-635 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1560-4292
DOI	10.1007/s40593-020-00198-z
Schlagwörter	Artificial Intelligence; Computer Uses in Education; Evaluation Methods; Student Satisfaction; Integrated Learning Systems; Access to Information; Time Management; Reflective Teaching + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Künstliche Intelligenz; Computernutzung; Zeitmanagement
Abstract	Mark and Greer's ("International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education," 4(2/3), 129-153, 1993) review was very influential in setting out effective goals and methods for evaluating adaptive educational systems of all kinds. A later review brought the story up to date (Greer, "International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education," 26(1), 387-392, 2016). The current paper explores a new range of evaluative goals which go beyond the quality of learning outcomes, learning efficiency, transfer, retention, and short-term motivation. While learner satisfaction has been downgraded over the years as a reliable indicator of learning quality, it cannot be wholly ignored in terms of wider issues such as the learner's developing metacognitive and meta-affective insight, regulatory competence and longer-term motivation. These factors lead on to such evaluable issues as the learner's appetite for further learning of the kind just experienced as well as for learning in general. The rise in the use of data analytics and the increasing use of AIED and computer-based learning systems in schools and universities has led to the development of orchestration systems to assist the teacher to manage their students using such systems. Orchestration systems raise new kinds of evaluation goal, such as the balance of activity, cooperation and agency between the human teacher and the adaptive systems, as well as between the learner, the systems, the teacher and, indeed, other learners. Further evaluable goals include the degree to which the teacher is alerted to the learning difficulties of the learners, the degree to which the teacher's scarce and valuable time is being used efficiently, and the degree to which the orchestration system can be used as a reflective device for teachers to examine their own practice. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01