Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inPalos, Steve
TitelRelationships between Learning Method, Gender, and Adult Learner Achievement
Quelle(2022), (237 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
Ph.D. Dissertation, Grand Canyon University
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Monographie
ISBN979-8-7906-3852-7
SchlagwörterHochschulschrift; Dissertation; Teaching Methods; Gender Differences; Adult Students; Academic Achievement; Student Centered Learning; Achievement Tests; College Students; Wechsler Individual Achievement Test
AbstractThe purpose of this quantitative, causal-comparative study was to determine how, and to what degree learning methods (student-centered or instructor-centered) and gender independently or interactively made a difference in adult student achievement. The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test Third Edition (WIAT-III) was utilized to measure achievement. Data were collected by using convenience sampling from the target population of adult college students, with a final sample of 139 participants. Cognitive learning theory, constructivist learning theory, and adult learning theory were used to guide this study. The research questions were: To what extent, if any, is there a difference in adult student achievement, as measured by the WIAT-III between students who learn with the student-centered method and students who learn with the instructor-centered method, to what extent, if any, is there a difference in adult student achievement as measured by the WIAT-III between male and female students, and to what extent, if any, is there an interaction between learning method and gender on adult student achievement as measured by the WIAT-III? A 2-way between-subjects ANOVA was used to determine whether there were any statistically significant differences between the groups being examined. The findings rejected the null hypotheses for learning method F(1, 135) = 24.710, p = 0.000, partial [eta]2 = 0.155, gender F(1, 135) = 122.453, p = 0.000, partial [eta]2 = 0.476, and interaction F(1, 135) = 34.350, p = 0.000, partial [eta]2 = 0.203. These findings may be used to inform higher education institutions and leaders of best practices in creating learning methods that best meet the needs of all adult learners. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.] (As Provided).
AnmerkungenProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2024/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Die Wikipedia-ISBN-Suche verweist direkt auf eine Bezugsquelle Ihrer Wahl.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: