Criteria for Evaluating Advancement Programs.

Sonst. Personen	Heemann, Warren (Hrsg.)
Institution	Council for Advancement and Support of Education, Washington, DC.
Titel	Criteria for Evaluating Advancement Programs.
Quelle	(1985), (27 Seiten)Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; Monographie
ISBN	0-89964-241-1
Schlagwörter	Leitfaden; Alumni; Evaluation Criteria; Fund Raising; Government School Relationship; Higher Education; Institutional Advancement; Institutional Evaluation; Periodicals; Program Administration; Program Evaluation; Public Relations; School Publications; Self Evaluation (Groups) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Fundraising; Spendensammlung; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; nicht übertragen; Periodical; Journal; Zeitschrift; Fachzeitschrift; Periodikum; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Public relation work; Öffentlichkeitsarbeit; Schulzeitung; Self evaluation; Group; Groups; Selbstevaluation; Gruppe (Soz)
Abstract	Criteria for evaluating college and university advancement programs are presented, based on the efforts of professional area trustees and advisory committees of the Council for Advancement and Support of Education (CASE). The criteria can be useful in three ways: as the basis of internal audits of advancement programs or program components; as the basis of external audits, such as those provided by the CASE evaluation service; and as guidance for visitation teams assembled by regional accrediting bodies. Seven types of advancement programs are covered: alumni relations, fund-raising, government relations, institutional relations, periodicals, publications, and management. For each type of program, criteria are listed for evaluating program objectives, management, organizational structure, responsibilities, and budgeting and evaluation. It is noted that periodic internal evaluations provide guidance for college planning and budgeting, as well as for preparing staff members for increased responsibility. Using objective evaluation standards promotes acceptance of the internal audit and enables comparisons with similar schools. The use of standards by external evaluators focuses attention on the larger and most important considerations. (SW)
Anmerkungen	Council for Advancement and Support of Education, 80 South Early St., Alexandria, VA 22304 ($10.00).
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC