Metacognitive knowledge about and metacognitive regulation of strategy use in self-regulated scientific discovery learning. New methods of assessment in computer-based learning environments.

Autor/inn/en	Thillmann, Hubertina; Gößling, Jill; Marschner, Jessica; Wirt, Joachim; Leutner, Detlev
Titel	Metacognitive knowledge about and metacognitive regulation of strategy use in self-regulated scientific discovery learning. New methods of assessment in computer-based learning environments.
Quelle	Aus: Azevedo, Roger (Hrsg.); Aleven, Vincent (Hrsg.): International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies. New York u.a.: Springer (2013) S. 575-588 PDF als Volltext Link als defekt meldenVerfügbarkeit
Reihe	Springer international handbooks of education. 26
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	online; gedruckt; Sammelwerksbeitrag
ISBN	1-4419-5545-3; 978-1-441-95545-6; 978-1-4419-5546-3
DOI	10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_37
Schlagwörter	Empirische Untersuchung; Metakognition; Medieneinsatz; Computerunterstützter Unterricht; Bewertungssystem; Metakognition; E-Learning; Lernumgebung; Computerunterstützter Unterricht; E-Learning; Bewertungssystem
Abstract	The aim of this chapter is to present new assessment methods for different aspects of metacognition that are relevant for self-regulated learning (SRL). In the theoretical part, two assumptions on the assessment of different aspects of metacognition are presented. Firstly, [the authors] argue that metacognitive knowledge about strategies and metacognitive regulation of strategies are two distinct components of metacognition that make different demands on their respective assessment method. Secondly, [the authors] argue that metacognitive knowledge about and metacognitive regulation of strategy use should be assessed with regard to the same strategies, in order to be able to relate both measures and to localize specific deficiencies. In the methods part, the theoretically driven development of two computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) for scientific discovery learning is presented. Based on these, two kinds of assessment methods are presented, a test format that intends to assess metacognitive knowledge about scientific discovery strategies and logfile-based measures that intend to assess metacognitive regulation of the use of these strategies during SRL with the CBLEs. In the empirical part, three studies are presented that investigated the test quality of these new assessment methods as well as the relationship between metacognitive knowledge about and metacognitive regulation of the same strategy. In sum, results speak in favor of a good test quality of the new assessment methods. Based on this, results revealed that the relationship between metacognitive knowledge about and metacognitive regulation of the actual use of the same strategy is moderated by current motivation. Finally, results are discussed with respect to the development of further instruments as well as with respect to approaches of SRL support. (Verlag).
Erfasst von	Externer Selbsteintrag
Update	2016/1