Improving Training in Methodology Enriches the Science of Psychology

Autor/inn/en	Aiken, Leona S.; West, Stephen G.; Millsap, Roger E.
Titel	Improving Training in Methodology Enriches the Science of Psychology
Quelle	In: American Psychologist, 64 (2009) 1, S.51-52 (2 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0003-066X
DOI	10.1037/a0014161
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Research Methodology; Psychology; Doctoral Programs; Statistics; Surveys; Researchers; North America + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Research method; Forschungsmethode; Psychologie; Doktorandenprogramm; Statistik; Survey; Umfrage; Befragung; Researcher; Forscher; Nordamerika
Abstract	Replies to the comment Ramifications of increased training in quantitative methodology by Herbet Zimiles on the current authors original article "Doctoral training in statistics, measurement, and methodology in psychology: Replication and extension of Aiken, West, Sechrest, and Reno's (1990) survey of PhD programs in North America". The current authors state that in their recent article, they reported the results of an extensive survey of quantitative training in all PhD programs in North America. They compared these results with those of a similar survey conducted 12 years earlier (Aiken, West, Sechrest, & Reno, 1990), and raised issues for the future methodological training of substantive and quantitative researchers in psychology. The authors then respond to Zimiles three questions. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10