Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Albarracin, Dolores; Hart, William; McCulloch, Kathleen C. |
|---|---|
| Titel | Associating versus Proposing or Associating What We Propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen |
| Quelle | In: Psychological Bulletin, 132 (2006) 5, S.732-735 (4 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0033-2909 |
| Schlagwörter | Social Psychology; Phenomenology; Models; Association (Psychology); Serial Ordering; Cognitive Processes; Definitions; Psychological Evaluation; Evaluation Methods |
| Abstract | This commentary on the article by B. Gawronski and G. V. Bodenhausen (see record 2006-10465-003) highlights the strengths of the associative-propositional evaluation model. It then describes problems in proposing a qualitative separation between propositional and associative processes. Propositional processes are instead described as associative. Propositions are ordered associations, whereas many other associations do not depend on the order of the involved elements. Implications of this alternative definition for the phenomenology of thought and for social psychology are discussed. (Author). |
| Anmerkungen | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications. |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2017/4/10 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
