Bibliometric and Content Analyses of Articles Related to Science Education for Special Education Students

Autor/in	Tosun, Cemal
Titel	Bibliometric and Content Analyses of Articles Related to Science Education for Special Education Students
Quelle	In: International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69 (2022) 1, S.352-369 (18 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Tosun, Cemal)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1034-912X
DOI	10.1080/1034912X.2021.2016659
Schlagwörter	Bibliometrics; Science Education; Special Education; Students with Disabilities; Authors; Periodicals; Research Methodology; Learning Disabilities; Sample Size; Barriers; Citations (References); Journal Articles; Geographic Location; Educational Practices; Sampling + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Bibliometrie; Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung; Special needs education; Sonderpädagogik; Sonderschulwesen; Student; Students; Disability; Disabilities; Schüler; Schülerin; Studentin; Behinderung; Author; Autor; Autorin; Periodical; Journal; Zeitschrift; Fachzeitschrift; Periodikum; Research method; Forschungsmethode; Learning handicap; Lernbehinderung; Citations; Zitat; Journal article; Zeitschriftenaufsatz; Bildungspraxis
Abstract	The aim of this study was to reveal trends of articles related to science education for special education students published in the SSCI journals. For bibliometric analysis, "Education & Educational Research" and "Education Specific" categories and SSCI journals were selected in WoS database and a total of 193 articles were accessed. In addition, content analysis of 100 articles was performed in the present study. The results of the bibliometric analysis showed that the most used keywords were science education, science, instruction, universal design for learning, special education, science instruction, learning disabilities, high school, students with disabilities, reading, dyslexia and inclusive education. The most productive authors were M.A. Mastropieri and T.E. Scruggs. The most cited journals was Remedial and Special Education, On the other hand, the most preferred research methods in the content analysis articles were experimental and literature review. Many of the articles focused on students with learning disabilities and various disabilities. The most preferred sample groups in these articles were middle school students and teachers. The sample size was between 31 and 100 for content analysis articles. In addition, analysis results showed that the sample size of general education students was higher than that of special education students. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01