Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Arévalo, María-José; Cantera, María Asun; García-Marina, Vanessa; Alves-Castro, Marian |
---|---|
Titel | Analysis of University STEM Students' Mathematical, Linguistic, Rhetorical-Organizational Assignment Errors |
Quelle | In: Education Sciences, 11 (2021), Artikel 173 (17 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Arévalo, María-José) ORCID (Cantera, María Asun) ORCID (García-Marina, Vanessa) ORCID (Alves-Castro, Marian) |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 2227-7102 |
Schlagwörter | STEM Education; Instructional Design; Essays; Computational Linguistics; Error Analysis (Language); Interdisciplinary Approach; Pilot Projects; Undergraduate Students; Writing (Composition); Engineering Education; Writing Skills; Error Patterns; Classification; Rhetoric; Communication Strategies; Mathematics; Connected Discourse; Writing Evaluation; Spanish; Integrated Learning Systems; Foreign Countries; Syntax; Punctuation; Writing Improvement; Spain STEM; Lesson concept; Lessonplan; Unterrichtsentwurf; Essay; Aufsatzunterricht; Linguistics; Computerlinguistik; Error analysis; Language; Fehleranalyse; Fächerübergreifender Unterricht; Fächerverbindender Unterricht; Interdisziplinarität; Pilot project; Modellversuch; Pilotprojekt; Schreibübung; Ingenieurausbildung; Writing skill; Schreibfertigkeit; Fehlertyp; Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem; Rhetorik; Kommunikationsstrategie; Mathematik; Spanisch; Ausland; Interpunktion; Spanien |
Abstract | Although Error Analysis (EA) has been broadly used in Foreign Language and Mother Tongue learning contexts, it has not been applied in the field of engineering and by STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) students in a systematic way. In this interdisciplinary pilot study, we applied the EA methodology to a wide corpus of exercises and essays written by third-year students of mechanical engineering, with the main purpose of achieving a precise diagnosis of the students' strengths and weaknesses in writing skills. For the analysis to be as exhaustive as possible, the errors were typologized into three main categories (linguistic, mathematical, and rhetorical-organizational), each of which is, in turn, subdivided into 15 items. The results show that the predominant errors are rhetorical-organizational (39%) and linguistic (38%). The application of EA permits the precise identification of the areas of improvement and the subsequent implementation of an educational design that allows STEM students to improve their communicative strategies, especially those related to the writing skills and, more precisely, those having to do with the optimal use of syntax, punctuation, rhetorical structure of the text, and mathematical coherence. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | MDPI AG. Klybeckstrasse 64, 4057 Basel, Switzerland. Tel: e-mail: indexing@mdpi.com; Web site: http://www.mdpi.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2022/1/01 |