A Descriptive Analysis of PETE Master's Programs in the United States and Their Alignment with Advanced Teaching Standards

Autor/in	Gilbert, Jamie
Titel	A Descriptive Analysis of PETE Master's Programs in the United States and Their Alignment with Advanced Teaching Standards
Quelle	In: Excellence in Education Journal, 9 (2020) 2, S.55-96 (42 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2474-4166
Schlagwörter	Physical Education; Teacher Education Programs; Masters Programs; Alignment (Education); Standards; Active Learning; Inquiry; Enrollment Management; Institutional Characteristics; Program Content; Admission Criteria; Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Teacher Leadership; Data Use; Curriculum Design; Teacher Certification; Educational Principles; Professional Development + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Körpererziehung; Sportunterricht; Magister course; Magisterstudiengang; Standard; Aktives Lernen; Programmgestaltung; Admission; Admission procedures; Zulassungsbedingung; Zulassungsverfahren; Zulassung; Pädagogische Kompetenz; Lehrerfunktionsstelle; Lehrplangestaltung; Bildungsprinzip
Abstract	Research regarding physical education teacher education (PETE) programs in the United States is narrowly focused, placing predominant emphasis on undergraduate programs. The purpose of this study was to provide a descriptive analysis of PETE master's programs in the United States and examine their adherence to SHAPE America's advanced standards and four guiding principles. A non-experimental, cross-sectional descriptive research design, and two-phase approach were used to collect data. A survey yielded descriptive statistics to analyze program demographics (n=13). Phone-based semi-structured interviews collected data from program affiliates (n=4) regarding adherence to advanced standards and four guiding principles. Data analysis revealed four dominant themes emerging from participant data: (1) Leadership Development; (2) Inquiry-Based Learning; (3) Curriculum Mapping; and (4) Enrollment Management. Findings explained programs integration and prioritization of advanced standards and four guiding principles, with direct alignment varying by program. Additionally, admission and licensure requirements have been altered to maximize enrollment potential. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Excellence in Education Journal. e-mail: eejeditor@gmail.com; Web site: http://www.excellenceineducationjournal.org/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01