Sorting out the Problem of Inert Knowledge: Category Construction to Promote Spontaneous Transfer

Autor/inn/en	Kurtz, Kenneth J.; Honke, Garrett
Titel	Sorting out the Problem of Inert Knowledge: Category Construction to Promote Spontaneous Transfer
Quelle	In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46 (2020) 5, S.803-821 (19 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0278-7393
DOI	10.1037/xlm0000750
Schlagwörter	Transfer of Training; Concept Formation; Classification; Experiments; Learning Processes; Task Analysis; Reading Comprehension + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Training; Transfer; Ausbildung; Concept learning; Begriffsbildung; Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem; Erprobung; Learning process; Lernprozess; Aufgabenanalyse; Leseverstehen
Abstract	A fundamental goal in the study of human cognition is to understand the transfer of knowledge. This goes hand-in-hand with the translational goal of promoting such transfer via instructional techniques. Despite a rich history of research using the analogical problem-solving paradigm, no study activity has been found to produce a robust rate of successful spontaneous transfer--even when the test is immediate. We propose the category status hypothesis as an explanation of the difficulty of transfer and as motivation for a novel approach to promoting transfer. We report a set of experiments evaluating a category construction technique based on a sorting task. In Experiment 1a, we found category construction to be significantly more effective than the "gold standard" of schema abstraction through comparison of 2 analogous cases. In Experiment 1b, we explored a variation of the category construction technique that did not reliably differ in effectiveness from comparison-based schema abstraction--we also verified that both study tasks were superior to a baseline task of separate summarization of 2 cases. In Experiment 2, we conducted a replication of the initial design with higher power and confirmed the significant advantage for category construction over schema abstraction via comparison. In Experiment 3, we compared category construction to an information-consistent reading comprehension control to evaluate competing interpretations of the category construction advantage found in Experiments 1 and 2. We discuss theoretical and applied implications of these findings. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01