An Innovative Strategy to Re-Build Trust in Educational Governance Systems after 40 Years of English Destabilising Rapid Reforms

Autor/in	Taysum, Alison
Titel	An Innovative Strategy to Re-Build Trust in Educational Governance Systems after 40 Years of English Destabilising Rapid Reforms
Quelle	In: Journal of Educational Administration and History, 52 (2020) 1, S.145-161 (17 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Taysum, Alison)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0022-0620
DOI	10.1080/00220620.2019.1605341
Schlagwörter	Trust (Psychology); Governance; Equal Education; Correlation; Historiography; Decision Making; Educational Administration; Administrative Organization; Educational Change; Outcomes of Education; Educational Innovation; Educational History; Foreign Countries; Access to Education; Educational Policy; United Kingdom (England) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Education; Educational policy; Financing; Steuerung; Bildung; Erziehung; Bildungspolitik; Finanzierung; Korrelation; Geschichtsschreibung; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Bildungsverwaltung; Schuladministration; Schulverwaltung; Bildungsreform; Lernleistung; Schulerfolg; Instructional innovation; Bildungsinnovation; History of education; Bildungsgeschichte; Ausland; Access; Zugang; Bildungszugang; Politics of education
Abstract	The paper explores the relationship between levels of equity and levels of trust in the English education system from 1944 to 2018. The conceptual framework is that of centralised and decentralised decision making in education governance systems taking a socio-historiographical approach. Evidence reveals the impact of rapid government-initiated reforms is system losses of valuable resources, and decreased morale of key change implementers. An innovative strategy for self-governance is presented with Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) that education system community members can (a) make observations, (b) develop/affirm beliefs, (c) develop methods to critique and test externally imposed rapid change and theories that inform good acts; (d) test for proof of concept, (e) develop principles of self-governance and trust in governance systems. Research to test proof of concept is recommended. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01