Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Lönngren, Johanna; Adawi, Tom; Svanström, Magdalena |
---|---|
Titel | Scaffolding Strategies in a Rubric-Based Intervention to Promote Engineering Students' Ability to Address Wicked Problems |
Quelle | In: European Journal of Engineering Education, 44 (2019) 1-2, S.196-221 (26 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Lönngren, Johanna) ORCID (Adawi, Tom) ORCID (Svanström, Magdalena) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0304-3797 |
DOI | 10.1080/03043797.2017.1404010 |
Schlagwörter | Engineering Education; Problem Solving; Intervention; Scoring Rubrics; Undergraduate Students; Teaching Methods; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique); Transfer of Training; Workshops; Cooperative Learning; Violence; Literacy; Foreign Countries; Metacognition; Thinking Skills; Student Evaluation; Afghanistan; Sweden Ingenieurausbildung; Problemlösen; Scoring formulas; Auswertungsbogen; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Training; Transfer; Ausbildung; Lernwerkstatt; Schulung; Kooperatives Lernen; Gewalt; Alphabetisierung; Schreib- und Lesefähigkeit; Ausland; Meta cognitive ability; Meta-cognition; Metakognitive Fähigkeit; Metakognition; Denkfähigkeit; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Schweden |
Abstract | In recent years, there has been increasing interest within the engineering education research community to prepare engineering students to address wicked problems (WPs) such as climate change, resource scarcity and violent conflict. Previous research suggests that engineering students are able to address WPs if they are given adequate support, but there is a lack of research on what kinds of support are needed. This paper aims to reduce this gap by reporting on students' performance in, and approaches to, addressing WPs when different scaffolding strategies were used in different parts of a rubric-based intervention. The intervention aimed to provide undergraduate engineering students with an understanding of the nature of WPs and with a structured way of addressing them. For each part of the intervention, we discuss affordances for learning provided by the different scaffolding strategies. The results suggest that strong cognitive scaffolding can support students' understanding of the nature of WPs and students' performance in written responses to WPs, but possibly also limits deep engagement with WPs and transfer of learning to other contexts. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |