Can Motivational Interviewing Follow-Up Calls Improve the Implementation and Retention of a Specific Communication Support (Key Word Sign) by Staff Supporting People with an Intellectual Disability? A Pilot Project

Autor/inn/en	Le Van, Laura; Crino, Rocco; Corneille, Samantha
Titel	Can Motivational Interviewing Follow-Up Calls Improve the Implementation and Retention of a Specific Communication Support (Key Word Sign) by Staff Supporting People with an Intellectual Disability? A Pilot Project
Quelle	In: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 44 (2019) 1, S.103-115 (13 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1366-8250
DOI	10.3109/13668250.2017.1310808
Schlagwörter	Interviews; Motivation; Training; Persistence; Intellectual Disability; Paraprofessional Personnel; Program Effectiveness; Knowledge Level; Skill Development; Job Skills; Fidelity; Program Implementation; Gender Differences; Educational Attainment; Employment Experience; Sign Language; Verbal Communication; Nonverbal Communication; Foreign Countries; Australia + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; psychologische; Motivation (psychologisch); Ausbildung; Ausdauer; Intellect; Disability; Disabilities; Verstand; Behinderung; Laienhelfer; Wissensbasis; Kompetenzentwicklung; Qualifikationsentwicklung; Produktive Fertigkeit; Geschlechterkonflikt; Bildungsabschluss; Bildungsgut; Occupational experience; Job experience; Work experience; Berufserfahrung; Gebärdensprache; Non-verbal communication; Nonverbale Kommunikation; Ausland; Australien
Abstract	Background: This study examined whether Motivational Interviewing (MI) follow-up calls improved the extent to which a specific therapeutic technique (Key Word Sign) presented in training was retained and implemented by staff supporting people with an intellectual disability.Method: Thirty-eight residential support workers who attended Key Word Sign (KWS) training were divided into three groups. One group received post training MI follow-up calls, the second received non-MI "check-in control" (CIC) follow-up calls and the third received no follow-up calls.Results: Both follow-up conditions outperformed the no follow-up condition on KWS knowledge retention and use. No significant differences were noted between the MI and CIC condition in this study.Conclusion: The results highlight the value of post-training follow-up in promoting knowledge retention and implementation of skills. Methodological challenges (including treatment fidelity issues across groups) prevented firm conclusions about the impact of MI from being drawn. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01