Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Dodson, Richard |
---|---|
Titel | An Analysis of Principal Perceptions of Required Evaluator Proficiency Exams Used in the Primary Teaching Evaluation System in Seven U.S. States |
Quelle | In: Educational Research Quarterly, 41 (2018) 4, S.3-29 (27 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0196-5042 |
Schlagwörter | Public Schools; Principals; Teacher Evaluation; Evaluators; Competence; Online Surveys; Administrator Attitudes; Achievement Tests; Test Validity; Video Technology; Evaluation Methods; Test Bias; Educational Quality; Participant Characteristics; Wisconsin; Arkansas; Delaware; Rhode Island; Illinois; Idaho; South Dakota Public school; Öffentliche Schule; Principal; Schulleiter; Teacher appraisal; Lehrerbeurteilung; Kompetenz; Achievement test; Achievement; Testing; Test; Tests; Leistungsbeurteilung; Leistungsüberprüfung; Leistung; Testdurchführung; Testen; Testvalidität; Testkritik; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; South-Dakota |
Abstract | This research examines how public school principals in seven U.S. states perceive the proficiency exam they must take and pass in order to evaluate their teachers. The test is centered on the states' primary teaching evaluation system, which is based on Charlotte Danielson's Framework for Teaching. An online survey was developed and 832 out of over 7,000 working principals across seven states responded, yielding a response rate of nearly 12%. States were selected to represent a cross section of high, middle, and low scorers in the annual "Education Week" "Quality Counts" report ("Education Week," 2016). Results showed that most principals were not satisfied with the proficiency test that they must take and pass in order to evaluate their staffs. Many principals called for the elimination or drastic overhaul of their proficiency exam. Suggested changes also showed that most principals wanted better quality videos they must watch to evaluate teaching lessons, and they also wanted the test to be less subjective. The survey showed that more principals than not believed the test was unfair and should not stay the same. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Behavioral Research Press. Grambling State University, Math Department, P.O. Box 1191, Grambling, LA 71245. Tel: 318-274-2425; Web site: http://erquarterly.org/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |