On Designing Construct Driven Situational Judgment Tests: Some Preliminary Recommendations

Autor/inn/en	Guenole, Nigel; Chernyshenko, Oleksandr S.; Weekly, Jeff
Titel	On Designing Construct Driven Situational Judgment Tests: Some Preliminary Recommendations
Quelle	In: International Journal of Testing, 17 (2017) 3, S.234-252 (19 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1530-5058
DOI	10.1080/15305058.2017.1297817
Schlagwörter	Situational Tests; Psychological Evaluation; Test Construction; Industrial Psychology; Construct Validity; Psychometrics; Test Items; Item Analysis; Item Response Theory; Scoring + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Situationsansatz; Psychosoziale Beurteilung; Testaufbau; Betriebspsychologie; Industriepsychologie; Psychometry; Psychometrie; Test content; Testaufgabe; Itemanalyse; Item-Response-Theorie; Bewertung
Abstract	Situational judgment tests (SJTs) are widely agreed to be a measurement technique. It is also widely agreed that SJTs are a questionable methodological choice for measurement of psychological constructs, such as behavioral competencies, due to a lack of evidence supporting appropriate factor structures and high internal consistencies. Nevertheless, both the peer review literature and applied instances of SJTs reveal no shortage of attempts to measure psychological constructs with SJTs. While acknowledging the lack of evidence supporting the ability of SJTs to assess psychological constructs, we see that a number of practical benefits would accrue to organizations if industrial psychologists were able to design SJTs that measure psychological constructs. Accordingly, this article presents a discussion of steps that psychologists can take to enhance the chances of observing validity evidence for construct based SJTs. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01