Military and Civilian L2 Instructors: Decoding Perceptions of U.S. Service Academy Cadets

Autor/in	Miller, Zachary F.
Titel	Military and Civilian L2 Instructors: Decoding Perceptions of U.S. Service Academy Cadets
Quelle	In: Applied Language Learning, 26 (2016) 2, S.25-52 (28 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1041-679X
Schlagwörter	Military Personnel; Second Language Learning; Second Language Instruction; Statistical Analysis; Language Teachers; German; Russian; Portuguese; Spanish; Interviews; Communication (Thought Transfer); Anxiety; Language Proficiency; Student Attitudes; Adult Students; Teacher Student Relationship; Teaching Methods; Team Teaching; Questionnaires; Military Training + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Zweitsprachenerwerb; Fremdsprachenunterricht; Statistische Analyse; Language teacher; Sprachunterricht; Deutscher; Russisch; Portugiesischunterricht; Spanisch; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Communication; thought; Kommunikation; Gedanke; Angst; Language skill; Language skills; Sprachkompetenz; Schülerverhalten; Adult; Adults; Student; Students; Erwachsenenalter; Studentin; Schüler; Schülerin; Teacher student relationships; Lehrer-Schüler-Beziehung; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Teamteaching; Fragebogen; Militärausbildung
Abstract	This study examined whether cadets at a U.S. service academy perceived attitudinal differences toward their military and civilian L2 instructors along three variables: foreign language expertise, communicative anxiety, and relatability. Cadets' proficiency levels (divided by beginning and intermediate classes) and current instructor (civilian or military) were also analyzed to determine their bearing on the perception data. Beginning and intermediate learners of Arabic, French, German, Portuguese, Russian, and Spanish (n=267) completed an instructor perception questionnaire and volunteer students (n=9) participated in group interviews to provide opinions of the two instructor types. Descriptive statistics indicated that cadets viewed civilian instructors as more knowledgeable in foreign languages, whereas military instructors as more relatable. Ratings for communicative anxiety were evenly spread between the two groups. Separate two-factor, between groups ANOVAs revealed significant differences between the two language level groups (beginning and intermediate) with respect to expertise and anxiety, but not for relatability. Current instructor (civilian or military) was not found to influence opinions. Interview data, while providing nuanced perspectives, generally aligned with the quantitative results. Findings from this study can help service academy L2 instructors modify their teaching approaches to better enhance foreign language achievement in the classroom. Team-teaching between the two instructor types is also viewed as a helpful pedagogical strategy. Lastly, the data provide insight into important topics in second language acquisition within the military community. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Defense Language Institute, Foreign Language Center. Academic Journals, 1759 Lewis Road Suite 142, Presidio of Monterey, Monterey, CA 93944-5006. Tel: 831-242-5638; Fax: 831-242-5850; e-mail: aj@pom-emh1.army.mil; Website: http://www.dliflc.edu/#homepage-tab\|3
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01