Defining the Language Assessment Literacy Gap: Evidence from a Parliamentary Inquiry

Autor/inn/en	Pill, John; Harding, Luke
Titel	Defining the Language Assessment Literacy Gap: Evidence from a Parliamentary Inquiry
Quelle	In: Language Testing, 30 (2013) 3, S.381-402 (22 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0265-5322
DOI	10.1177/0265532213480337
Schlagwörter	Language Tests; Testing; Foreign Nationals; Foreign Medical Graduates; Physicians; Foreign Countries; Scores; Misconceptions; Test Construction; Language Proficiency; Hearings; Discourse Analysis; Classification; Licensing Examinations (Professions); Culture Fair Tests; English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Standard Setting; Documentation; Expertise; Evaluators; Illiteracy; Public Policy; Policy Analysis; Federal Government; Australia; International English Language Testing System + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Language test; Sprachtest; Testdurchführung; Testen; Ausländer; Ausländerin; Physician; Doctor; Arzt; Ausland; Missverständnis; Testaufbau; Language skill; Language skills; Sprachkompetenz; Diskursanalyse; Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem; English as second language; English; Second Language; Englisch als Zweitsprache; Zweitsprachenerwerb; Standardisierung; Dokumentation; Expert appraisal; Analphabetismus; Öffentliche Ordnung; Politikfeldanalyse; Bundesregierung; Australien; Language tests; Englisch
Abstract	This study identifies a unique context for exploring lay understandings of language testing and, by extension, for characterizing the nature of language assessment literacy among non-practitioners, stemming from data in an inquiry into the registration processes and support for overseas trained doctors by the Australian House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health and Ageing. The data come from Hansard transcripts of public hearings of the inquiry. Sections of the data related to language and language testing (as part of the current registration process for doctors seeking employment in Australia) were identified and coded using a thematic analysis. Findings reveal misconceptions about who is responsible for tests and for decisions based on scores in this context, as well as misconceptions about language testing procedures. Issues also emerge concerning the location of expertise in language and language testing. Discussion of these findings contributes to current debate within the language testing community (e.g., Taylor, 2009) about where responsibility lies for increasing language assessment literacy among non-practitioner stakeholders and how this might best be achieved. (Contains 2 tables, 2 figures, and 2 notes.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10