The Law Review Approach: What the Humanities Can Learn

Autor/in	Mendenhall, Allen
Titel	The Law Review Approach: What the Humanities Can Learn
Quelle	In: Academic Questions, 26 (2013) 1, S.48-58 (11 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0895-4852
DOI	10.1007/s12129-013-9341-z
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Writing for Publication; Humanities; State of the Art Reviews; Evaluation Criteria; Best Practices; Change Strategies; Faculty Publishing; Benchmarking; Adoption (Ideas) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Geisteswissenschaften; Humanwissenschaften; Entwicklungsstand; Lösungsstrategie; Ideas; Ideenfindung
Abstract	Readers of this journal probably know how the peer review process works in the humanities disciplines and at various journals. Therefore the author explains how the law review process generally works and then what the humanities can learn and borrow from the law review process. He ends by advocating for a hybrid law review/peer review approach to publishing. The law review process is not a panacea for publishing ills. It has several drawbacks and shortcomings. This essay highlights the positives and notes some of the negatives of the law review publishing process. Every law review has its idiosyncrasies and methodologies, but most share certain overarching procedures and protocols that can be evaluated in terms of their similarity. (Contains 7 footnotes.) (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10