Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enSha, Lele; Rakovic, Mladen; Li, Yuheng; Whitelock-Wainwright, Alexander; Carroll, David; Gaševic, Dragan; Chen, Guanliang
TitelWhich Hammer Should I Use? A Systematic Evaluation of Approaches for Classifying Educational Forum Posts
[Konferenzbericht] Paper presented at the International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM) (14th, Online, Jun 29-Jul 2, 2021).
Quelle(2021), (12 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Monographie
SchlagwörterClassification; Computer Mediated Communication; Learning Analytics; Data Analysis; Artificial Intelligence; Models; Academic Achievement; Comparative Analysis; Online Courses; Universities; Integrated Learning Systems; Foreign Countries; College Faculty; Computer Software; Australia; California (Stanford)
AbstractClassifying educational forum posts is a longstanding task in the research of Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining. Though this task has been tackled by applying both traditional Machine Learning (ML) approaches (e.g., Logistics Regression and Random Forest) and up-to-date Deep Learning (DL) approaches, there lacks a systematic examination of these two types of approaches to portray their performance difference. To better guide researchers and practitioners to select a model that suits their needs the best, this study aimed to systematically compare the effectiveness of these two types of approaches for this specific task. Specifically, we selected a total of six representative models and explored their capabilities by equipping them with either extensive input features that were widely used in previous studies (traditional ML models) or the state-of-the-art pre-trained language model BERT (DL models). Through extensive experiments on two real-world datasets (one is open-sourced), we demonstrated that: (i) DL models uniformly achieved better classification results than traditional ML models and the performance difference ranges from 1.85% to 5.32% with respect to different evaluation metrics; (ii) when applying traditional ML models, different features should be explored and engineered to tackle different classification tasks; (iii) when applying DL models, it tends to be a promising approach to adapt BERT to the specific classification task by fine-tuning its model parameters. [For the full proceedings, see ED615472.] (As Provided).
AnmerkungenInternational Educational Data Mining Society. e-mail: admin@educationaldatamining.org; Web site: https://educationaldatamining.org/conferences/
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2024/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Da keine ISBN zur Verfügung steht, konnte leider kein (weiterer) URL generiert werden.
Bitte rufen Sie die Eingabemaske des Karlsruher Virtuellen Katalogs (KVK) auf
Dort haben Sie die Möglichkeit, in zahlreichen Bibliothekskatalogen selbst zu recherchieren.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: