A Comparative, Descriptive Study of Three Research-Practice Partnerships: Goals, Activities, and Influence on District Policy, Practice, and Decision Making. Technical Report No. 4

Autor/inn/en	Penuel, William R.; Farrell, Caitlin C.; Anderson, Eleanor R.; Coburn, Cynthia E.; Allen, Anna-Ruth; Bohannon, Angel X.; Hopkins, Megan; Brown, Stephanie
Institution	National Center for Research in Policy and Practice (NCRPP); University of Colorado Boulder (UCB), School of Education; Northwestern University, School of Education and Social Policy; Harvard University, Center for Education Policy Research (CEPR)
Titel	A Comparative, Descriptive Study of Three Research-Practice Partnerships: Goals, Activities, and Influence on District Policy, Practice, and Decision Making. Technical Report No. 4
Quelle	(2020), (49 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	Weitere Informationen
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Educational Research; Partnerships in Education; Instructional Improvement; Mathematics Instruction; Administrative Organization; Activities; Influences; School Districts; Organizational Objectives; Research Reports; Authors; Decision Making; Board of Education Policy; Educational Practices; Research Utilization; Elementary School Mathematics; Middle School Mathematics + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Bildungsforschung; Pädagogische Forschung; Hochschulpartnerschaft; Unterrichtsqualität; Mathematics lessons; Mathematikunterricht; Influence; Einfluss; Einflussfaktor; School district; Schulbezirk; Business goal; Unternehmensziel; Research report; Forschungsbericht; Author; Autor; Autorin; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Bildungspraxis; Forschungsumsetzung; Elementare Mathematik; Schulmathematik
Abstract	This study describes the activities and influence of three different types of research practice partnerships (RPPs) that shared a common focus on improving mathematics teaching and learning. The three types of RPPs were a networked improvement community (NIC), a design research partnership (DRP), and a research alliance (RA). These types differ in the kinds of roles researchers and practitioners typically play, as well as in their approaches to research. As such, a descriptive study has the potential to improve understanding of the relationship between the design of an RPP and its influence on the partner district policies and practices. Data collection for this study sought to elicit information about each partnership's goals, activities, and influence on district policies and practices. It focused on the work of each RPP between 2016 and 2018. The research questions were: (1) How did the RPPs differ with respect to their organization and major activities?; (2) What kinds of research products did the RPPs produce?; (3) What influence did the RPPs have on partner districts' decisions regarding policies, programs, and practices?; and (4) What influence did the RPPs have on sharing research-based ideas with their district-leader partners? In answering each of the questions related to products and influences, the authors consider how the organization of each RPP helps to account for variations observed across partnerships, as well as how local conditions that may be unique to a particular RPP might matter. For district leaders seeking to partner, answers to these questions can inform their thinking about who would make a good partner and how to organize the joint work, depending on the needs of that district. Similarly, they can also inform future research to test strategies for improving the effectiveness of partnerships. (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	National Center for Research in Policy and Practice. Web site: http://ncrpp.org/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2022/1/01