A Comparison of Two Methods of Identifying Beating-the-Odds High Schools in Puerto Rico. REL 2017-167

Autor/inn/en	Meyers, Coby V.; Wan, Yinmei
Institution	Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands (ED); Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC); National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (ED)
Titel	A Comparison of Two Methods of Identifying Beating-the-Odds High Schools in Puerto Rico. REL 2017-167
Quelle	(2016), (31 Seiten) PDF als Volltext (1); PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei (2) Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	Weitere Informationen
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	High Schools; Public Schools; Comparative Analysis; Evaluation Methods; School Effectiveness; Poverty; Performance Based Assessment; Achievement Gains; Achievement Rating; Graduation Rate; Reading Rate; Mathematics Achievement; Correlation; Institutional Characteristics; School Statistics; Data Analysis; Test Reliability; Test Validity; Puerto Rico + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? High school; Oberschule; Public school; Öffentliche Schule; Schuleffizienz; Armut; Leistungsermittlung; Achievement gain; Leistungssteigerung; Achievement; Rating; Leistung; Beurteilung; Leistungsbeurteilung; Reading readiness; Reading speed; Lesegeschwindigkeit; Mathmatics sikills; Mathmatics achievement; Mathematical ability; Mathematische Kompetenz; Korrelation; Auswertung; Testreliabilität; Testvalidität
Abstract	The Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast and Islands conducted this study using data on public high schools in Puerto Rico from national and territory databases to compare methods for identifying beating-the-odds schools. Schools were identified by two methods, a status method that ranked high-poverty schools based on their current observed performance and an exceeding-achievement-expectations method that ranked high-poverty schools based on the extent to which their actual performance exceeded (or fell short of) their expected performance. Graduation rates, reading proficiency rates, and mathematics proficiency rates were analyzed to identify schools for each method. The identified schools were then compared by method to determine agreement rates--that is, the amount of overlap in schools identified by each method. The report presents comparisons of the groups of schools--those identified by each method and all public high-poverty high schools in Puerto Rico--on descriptive information. Using the two methods--ranking by status and ranking by exceeding-achievement-expectations--two different lists of beating-the-odds schools were identified. The status method identified 17 schools, and the exceeding-achievement-expectations method identified 15 schools. Six schools were identified by both methods. The agreement rate between the two lists of beating-the-odds schools was 38 percent. The analyses suggest that using both methods to identify beating-the-odds schools is the best strategy because high schools identified by both methods demonstrate high levels of absolute performance and appear to be achieving higher levels of graduation rates and percent proficiency than might be expected given their demographics and prior performance. Appended are: (1) Details on Data and Methods as Well as Additional Findings; and (2) Sensitivity Analysis Results. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands. Available from: Institute of Education Sciences. 555 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20208. Tel: 800-872-5327; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01