Imitation, Awareness, and Folk Linguistic Artifacts

Autor/in	Brunner, Elizabeth Gentry
Titel	Imitation, Awareness, and Folk Linguistic Artifacts
Quelle	(2010), (176 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit Ph.D. Dissertation, Rice University
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
ISBN	978-1-1248-0387-6
Schlagwörter	Hochschulschrift; Dissertation; Imitation; North American English; Native Speakers; Language Variation; Sociolinguistics; Folk Culture; Metalinguistics; English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Pronunciation; Auditory Perception; Intonation; Vowels; Speech; Classification + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Thesis; Dissertations; Academic thesis; Amerikanisches Englisch; Muttersprachler; Sprachenvielfalt; Soziolinguistik; Metalanguage; Metasprache; English as second language; English; Second Language; Englisch als Zweitsprache; Zweitsprachenerwerb; Aussprache; Auditive Wahrnehmung; Akustische Wahrnehmung; Akustik; Speaking; Sprechen; Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem
Abstract	Imitations are sophisticated performances displaying regular patterns. The study of imitation allows linguists to understand speakers' perceptions of sociolinguistic variation. In this dissertation, I analyze imitations of non-native accents in order to answer two questions: what can imitation reveal about perception, and how are "folk linguistic artifacts" (Preston 1996) involved in imitation? These questions are approached from the framework of "folk linguistic awareness" (Preston 1996). By redefining the concept of salience according to the modes of folk linguistic awareness, I am able to more precisely consider how imitation reflects salience. I address both of these questions by eliciting imitations from speakers in which folk artifacts are present. For my investigation, twenty speakers read a short passage in English. Ten were non-native speakers of American English (NNAE) and ten were native speakers of American English (AE). The AE speakers were recorded reading the passage in their regular voice and with two types of imitated accents: "free imitations," which were spontaneously produced, and "modeled imitations," which were produced directly after hearing the NNAE speakers. Free imitations revealed folk linguistic artifacts, while modeled imitations were more reflective of the immediate target. Participants listened to the authentic and imitated accents and were asked to determine the accent and authenticity of each speaker. I found that there was not a significant difference in the pitch and vowels between free and modeled AE imitations, which indicated that these aspects of imitations are largely based on folk linguistic artifacts. Listeners were able to determine which voices were authentic and which were imitated. Listeners were also able to identify the speakers' accents, perhaps aided by the folk artifact status of these particular accents. Listeners were better at identifying the accents of free imitations than modeled imitations, which suggested that listeners prefer imitations that are solely based on folk artifacts. Overall, I found that imitation is a valuable tool for the analysis of speech perception. The modes of folk linguistic awareness are useful in interpreting imitations and understanding salience. This research shows that folk linguistic artifacts are the foundation of imitations and an important tool in perceptual categorization. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.] (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10