Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Elliot, Andrew J.; Murayama, Kou; Pekrun, Reinhard |
---|---|
Titel | A 3 x 2 achievement goal model. |
Quelle | In: The journal of educational psychology, 103 (2011) 3, S. 632-648Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | online; gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0022-0663; 1939-2176 |
DOI | 10.1037/a0023952 |
Schlagwörter | Persönlichkeit; Selbstkonzept; Vermeiden; Begabung; Annäherung; Leistung; Modell; Ziel; Zielorientierung |
Abstract | Proposes and tests a 3x2 achievement goal model. The proposed model is yielded by crossing definition standards (task-based, self-based, and other-based achievement goals) with the ways in which competence can be valenced (approach-based or avoidance-based). 2 studies were conducted with a total of 441 undergraduate students from Germany (Study 1) and the United States (Study 2) to examine the structure of their achievement goals. Participants completed an English or German version of the 3 x 2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire (AGQ) in regards to taking an upcoming exam. In addition, temperament (Approach-Avoidance Temperament Questionnaire), exam performance, intrinsic motivation (Intrinsic Motivation Scale), learning efficacy (Academic Efficacy Scale), worry about exams (Worry-Emotionality Scale), absorption in class, energy in class (Activation-Deactivation Adjective Checklist, AD-ACL), SAT scores, and response bias (Impression Management scale, BIDR) were assessed as possible antecedents and consequences. Results confirmed the 3x2 structure of achievement goals, as the 3x2 model was found to better fit to the data than a 2x2 model. Furthermore, temperament was linked to the 3x2 achievement goals, and correlations between the different types of goals in the model and consequences such as intrinsic motivation, learning efficacy, energy in class and absorption were found. The results point to the need to distinguish between self-based and task-based forms of achievement goals. (ZPID). |
Erfasst von | Leibniz-Institut für Psychologie, Trier |
Update | 2012/3 |