Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Osterloh, Margit; Frey, Bruno S. |
---|---|
Titel | Research governance in academia. Are there alternatives to academic rankings? |
Quelle | München: CESifo (2009), 50 S.
PDF als Volltext |
Reihe | CESifo working paper. 2797. Public Finance |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | online; Monographie; Graue Literatur |
Schlagwörter | Forschung; Wirtschaftspsychologie; Bewertung; Forschung; Organisation; Theorie; Wirtschaftspsychologie; Analyse; Wissenschaftspolitik; Hochschulforschung; Hochschulforschung; Wissenschaftspolitik; Analyse; Arbeitspapier; Bewertung; Organisation; Publikation; Theorie |
Abstract | Peer reviews and rankings today are the backbone of research governance, but recently came under scrutiny. They take explicitly or implicitly agency theory as a theoretical basis. The emerging psychological economics opens a new perspective. As scholarly research is a mainly curiosity driven endeavor, we include intrinsic motivation and supportive feedback by the peers as important determinants of scholarly behavior. We discuss whether a stronger emphasis on selection and socialization offers an alternative to the present regime of academic rankings. |
Erfasst von | ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Kiel |
Update | 2010/2 |