What actually differs between Traditional Teaching and Sport Education in students' learning outcomes? A critical systematic review.

Autor/inn/en	Bessa, Cristiana; Hastie, Peter; Ramos, Ana; Mesquita, Isabel
Titel	What actually differs between Traditional Teaching and Sport Education in students' learning outcomes? A critical systematic review. Gefälligkeitsübersetzung: Was ist der eigentliche Unterschied zwischen "Traditional Teaching" und "Sport Education" hinsichtlich der Lernergebnisse der Schüler? Eine kritische systematische Übersicht.
Quelle	In: Journal of sports science & medicine, 20 (2021) 1, S. 110-125 PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei (1); PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei (2) Link als defekt meldenVerfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1303-2968
DOI	10.52082/jssm.2021.110
Schlagwörter	Empirische Forschung; Lehrer; Lehrerverhalten; Lernerfolg; Lernprozess; Methodik; Unterrichtsmethode; Schulsport; Sportpädagogik; Sportunterricht; Literaturübersicht; Methodenvergleich
Abstract	This systematic review aimed to examine the main findings concerning to the investigations focused on compare, within Physical Education context, the influence of Sport Education (SE) and Traditional Teaching (TT) on students' learning outcomes. A literature search was conducted on nine electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Academic Search Ultimate, ERIC, Education Source, APA PsycINFO and APA PsycARTICLES). Inclusion criteria were defined before the selection process. Accordingly, were only included articles that (i) were published in peer-reviewed international journals indexed in Journal Citation Reports or Scientific Journal Rankings; (ii) were available in full-text; (iii) were published in English, Portuguese or Spanish; (iv) were performed within Physical Education context; and (v) provided specifically a comparison between the effects of SE and TT on students' learning outcomes. Globally, twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The manuscripts' methodological quality was assessed through Downs and Black checklist, with all studies displaying moderate quality. Results showed that comparisons among SE and TT tend to analyze team sports activities sampling high-school students via quasi-experimental designs, with more than half of them were published over the past five years. Also, these investigations typically focused on the differences between both models on the development of personal and social skills, as well as its impact on the motor and cognitive domains. In this respect, although the results tend to point out increases in both SE and TT, superior values are achieved when SE is implemented. The analysis of the teaching-learning process using alternative research methods and designs (i.e., experimental studies, qualitative data, longitudinal analysis, action-research and case studies), longer units with appropriate planning, and the report of model's fidelity so that robust findings can endorse the teachers' praxis, must be a concern in future studies. (Autor).
Erfasst von	Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft, Bonn
Update	2021/3