Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Alcock, Lara; Inglis, Matthew |
|---|---|
| Titel | Representation Systems and Undergraduate Proof Production: A Comment on Weber |
| Quelle | In: Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28 (2009) 4, S.209-211 (3 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0732-3123 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.10.001 |
| Schlagwörter | Stellungnahme; Mathematics Instruction; Mathematical Logic; Validity; Probability; Undergraduate Study; Higher Education; Statistics; College Mathematics; Mathematics Education |
| Abstract | Weber (2009) suggested that counterexamples can be generated by a syntactic proof production, apparently contradicting our earlier assertion (Alcock & Inglis, 2008). Here we point out that this ostensible difference is the result of Weber working with theoretical definitions that differ slightly from ours. We defend our approach by arguing that Weber's relies upon an as yet unspecific metric for gauging the amount of work conducted in each representation system, and that it does not recognize an important asymmetry between the status of representation systems in the context of undergraduate mathematics. (Contains 2 figures.) (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com; Web site: http://www.elsevier.com |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2017/4/10 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
