Optimising the Efficacy of Hybrid Academic Teams: Lessons from a Systematic Review Process

Autor/inn/en	Lake, Warren; Wallin, Margie; Boyd, Bill; Woolcott, Geoff; Markopoulos, Christos; Boyd, Wendy; Foster, Alan
Titel	Optimising the Efficacy of Hybrid Academic Teams: Lessons from a Systematic Review Process
Quelle	In: Australian Universities' Review, 6 (2018) 1, S.16-24 (9 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0818-8068
Schlagwörter	Literature Reviews; Research Projects; Research Methodology; Teamwork; Selection Criteria; Group Membership; Teacher Collaboration; Group Dynamics + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Forschungsvorhaben; Research method; Forschungsmethode; Selection criterion; Auslesekriterium; Gruppenzugehörigkeit; Lehrerkooperation; Gruppendynamik
Abstract	Undertaking a systematic review can have many benefits, beyond any theoretical or conceptual discoveries pertaining to the underlying research question. This paper explores the value of utilising a hybrid academic team when undertaking the systematic review process, and shares a range of practical strategies. The paper also comments on how such a hybrid team sits in a continuum of cooperation, coordination and collaboration. Key recommendations include choosing a great team, communicating well, documenting everything, and being explicit--for the benefit of your research team, and the readers of your systematic review. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	National Tertiary Education Union. PO Box 1323, South Melbourne 3205, Australia. Tel: +61-3-92541910; Fax: +61-3-92541915; e-mail: editor@aur.org.au; Web site: http://www.aur.org.au
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01