Concurrent Movement Impairs Incidental but Not Intentional Statistical Learning

Autor/inn/en	Stevens, David J.; Arciuli, Joanne; Anderson, David I.
Titel	Concurrent Movement Impairs Incidental but Not Intentional Statistical Learning
Quelle	In: Cognitive Science, 39 (2015) 5, S.1081-1098 (18 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0364-0213
DOI	10.1111/cogs.12180
Schlagwörter	Incidental Learning; Intentional Learning; Motion; Brain; Physical Activities; Exercise + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Inzidentelles Lernen; Intentionales Lernen; Bewegungsablauf; Gehirn; Übung
Abstract	The effect of concurrent movement on incidental versus intentional statistical learning was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants learned the statistical regularities embedded within familiarization stimuli implicitly, whereas in Experiment 2 they were made aware of the embedded regularities and were instructed explicitly to learn these regularities. Experiment 1 demonstrated that while the control group were able to learn the statistical regularities, the resistance-free cycling group and the exercise group did not demonstrate learning. This is in contrast with the findings of Experiment 2, where all three groups demonstrated significant levels of learning. The results suggest that the movement demands, rather than the physiological stress, interfered with statistical learning. We suggest movement activates the striatum, which is not only responsible for motor control but also plays a role in incidental learning. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01