Class Differences: Online Education in the United States, 2010

Autor/inn/en	Allen, I. Elaine; Seaman, Jeff
Institution	Sloan Consortium
Titel	Class Differences: Online Education in the United States, 2010
Quelle	(2010), (30 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Quantitative Daten; Electronic Learning; Strategic Planning; Online Courses; Educational Technology; Computer Uses in Education; Colleges; Distance Education; Learning Strategies; Conventional Instruction; Economic Impact; Federal Government; Student Financial Aid; Enrollment Trends; Deans; Outcomes of Education + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Strategy; Planning; Strategie; Planung; Online course; Online-Kurs; Unterrichtsmedien; Computernutzung; College; Hochschule; Fachhochschule; Distance study; Distance learning; Fernunterricht; Learning methode; Learning techniques; Lernmethode; Lernstrategie; Ökonomische Determinanten; Bundesregierung; Finanzielle Beihilfe; Studienfinanzierung; Studienförderung; Dean; Dekan; Lernleistung; Schulerfolg
Abstract	"Class Differences: Online Education in the United States, 2010" represents the eighth annual report on the state of online learning in U.S. higher education. The survey is designed, administered and analyzed by the Babson Survey Research Group with support from Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Data collection is conducted in partnership with the College Board. This year's study, like those for the previous seven years, is aimed at answering some of the fundamental questions about the nature and extent of online education. Based on responses from more than 2,500 colleges and universities, the study addresses: Is online learning strategic? After remaining steady for a number of years, the proportion of chief academic officers saying that online education is critical to their long-term strategy took an upward turn in 2010. Sixty-three percent of all reporting institutions said that online learning was a critical part of their institution's long term strategy, a small increase from fifty-nine percent in 2009. The year-to-year change was greatest among the for-profit institutions, which increased from fifty-one percent agreeing in 2009 to sixty-one percent in 2010. For-profit institutions also were the most likely to have included online learning as a part of their strategic plan. (Contains 9 footnotes.) [For the previous report, "Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States, 2009," see ED529931.] (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	Sloan Consortium. P.O. Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950. Tel: 781-583-7561; Fax: 888-898-6209; e-mail: info@sloanconsortium.org; Web site: http://sloanconsortium.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10