European higher education policy and the social dimension. A comparative study of the Bologna process.

Autor/in	Kooij, Yasemin
Titel	European higher education policy and the social dimension. A comparative study of the Bologna process.
Quelle	Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan (2015)Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; Monographie
ISBN	9781137473134
Schlagwörter	Europa; Bologna process (European higher education); Higher education and state; European Union countries; Education, Higher; Social aspects; Aims and objectives; EDUCATION / Higher; EDUCATION / Educational Policy & Reform / General; EDUCATION / Philosophy & Social Aspects; Bildungsgeschichte + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Bologna process; Bologna-Prozess; Higher education; State; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Staat; European Union; Member state; Country; Europäische Union; Mitgliedsstaat; Mitgliedsstaaten; Land; Hochschule; Fachhochschule; Universität; Social behavior; Social behaviour; Soziales Verhalten; Aim; Aims; Objectives; Zweck; Ziel; Ziele; Zielsetzung; Education; Policy; Reform; Bildung; Erziehung; Politik; Philosophy; Social characteristics; Philosophie; Gesellschaftsbild
Abstract	-- 1. Introduction 2. A Discussion on the Key Themes of the Social Dimension 3. The Bologna Process 4. The Social Dimension of the Bologna Process 5. The Social Dimension at the National Level 6. The Social Dimension as an Agenda Item 7. Conclusion.. "The Bologna Process has significantly shaped recent higher education policies across Europe, but the area of the social dimension has so far been neglected. Drawing on a cross-country case study (Finland, Germany and Turkey), this book examines the major Bologna reforms, in particular the social dimension, and whether this aspect has successfully been incorporated into policy. Discussing key themes, actors, goals, policies and agendas and setting out recommendations, this book examines the social dimension as a component of the Bologna Process"--Provided by publisher.
Erfasst von	Library of Congress, Washington, DC
Update	2015/1/03