Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Burch, Patricia |
---|---|
Titel | The professionalization of instructional leadership in the United States: competing values and current tensions. |
Quelle | In: Journal of education policy, 22 (2007) 2, S. 195-214Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Beigaben | Tabellen |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | online; gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0268-0939; 1464-5106 |
DOI | 10.1080/02680930601158943 |
Schlagwörter | Bildungsprozess; Bildungsmanagement; Bildungspolitik; Bildungsmarkt; Lehrer; Modellbildung; Beruf; Professionalisierung; Nordamerika; USA |
Abstract | While there has been considerable scholarship on the role of school and district leadership within instructional change, there has been little analysis of the values and orientations that undergird current policy debates about instructional leadership. This article outlines the importance of examining instructional leadership in the context of broader political and cultural debates about government and about how society should be organized. It identifies two distinct models of instructional leadership emerging as part of these dynamics: the market model and the polis model. Drawing on interviews and observations with 59 school staff across three cities and with 55 district administrators, it examines the tensions that these competing models create for school administrators working in improving schools within high poverty communities. In each district, system-wide press to improve instruction activated district management practices that contradicted reform goals of building a professional community of educators and administrators focused on teaching and learning. Further, how district staff viewed and approached their work departed in significant ways from the management practices of school administrators. Based on this research, the article identifies the importance of administrators' professional contexts in studies of instructional leadership. (DIPF/Orig.). |
Erfasst von | DIPF | Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, Frankfurt am Main |
Update | 2008/1 |