Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Sabel, Joachim |
|---|---|
| Titel | Das Passiv im Deutschen. Derivationale Ökonomie vs. optionale Bewegung. |
| Quelle | In: Linguistische Berichte, (1999) 177, S. 87-112 |
| Beigaben | Anmerkungen |
| Sprache | deutsch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0024-3930 |
| Schlagwörter | Didaktische Grundlageninformation; Deutschunterricht; Linguistik; Passiv; Syntax; Transformationsgrammatik; Wortstellung; Niederländisch; Analyse |
| Abstract | The starting point for the investigation is the idea that different versions of the Principles and Parameters theory make different predictions concerning structurally ambiguous word orders in passive constructions in German. In a theory in which Move-a applies freely, as in the theory developed in LECTURES ON GOVERNMENT AND BINDING (Chomsky 1981) and following work (for example Chomsky 1982, 1986a, 1986b) multiple, different derivations for such orders cannot be excluded. Another situation arises if the relevant constructions are analyzed in the framework of the Minimalist Program (Chomsky 1995). In this framework, it is possible to restrict the possible derivations which are compatible with one word order via economy principles. On the basis of different syntactic tests it will be shown that the word orders of the relevant type are in fact not ambiguous but are only compatible with one derivation. It is argued that this result can be derived from the economy principle 'a enters the numeration only if it has an effect on output'. The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, the phenomenon of multiple derivations is discussed. If one assumes that NP-movement and scrambling may apply optionally and that no restrictions hold for potential derivations, the multiple derivation problem clearly arises in German passive constructions. In section 3, the author discusses the prerequisites for the inspection of the predictions of the different variants of the Principles and Parameter framework. On the basis of syntactic tests he shows that the relevant examples are in fact not structurally ambiguous but structural unambiguous, as predicted by an analysis of these constructions that is based on the framework of the Minimalist Program. Section 4 describes the consequences of the analysis for further movement types and further languages such as Dutch and Japanese. Section 5 provides the conclusion. (Verlag, adapt.). |
| Erfasst von | Informationszentrum für Fremdsprachenforschung, Marburg |
| Update | 2000_(CD) |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
