Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Brandstätter, Veronika; Giesinger, Lukas; Job, Veronika; Frank, Elisabeth |
---|---|
Titel | The role of deliberative versus implemental mindsets in time prediction and task accomplishment. |
Quelle | In: Social psychology, 46 (2015) 2, S. 104-115Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | online; gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1864-9335; 2151-2590 |
DOI | 10.1027/1864-9335/a000231 |
Schlagwörter | Schätzung; Entscheidung; Problemlösen; Motivation; Zeit; Intention; Leistung; Vorhersage; Ziel; Zielorientierung; Student; Studienanfänger |
Abstract | The model of action phases (Gollwitzer, 1990, 2012) distinguishes an implemental mindset evoked by planning goal-directed actions, from a deliberative mindset evoked by pondering pros/cons of adopting a particular goal. The present research demonstrates that mindsets affect time predictions. In Study 1 (N = 151), participants in an implemental mindset made shorter time predictions with respect to completing personal goals than participants in a deliberative mindset. In Study 2 (N = 78), a mediating mechanism for the mindset effect was tested by varying the motivation to return a report. The mindset effect was replicated in the low- but not in the high-motivation condition with participants in an implemental mindset returning the report earlier, and being as accurate in their predictions as participants in a deliberative mindset. Results indicate that an implemental (vs. deliberative) mindset increases motivation and therefore leads to shorter, but equally biased time predictions. (ZPID). |
Erfasst von | Leibniz-Institut für Psychologie, Trier |
Update | 2016/2 |